Advertisement

Students Don't Have Constitutional Right to Participate in Sports

By John T. Wolohan
Dec. 29, 2008

     Comments (4)

With the value of an athletic scholarship rising with the cost of tuition, the amount of time and money some parents are willing to devote to their children's athletic development — particularly in families where a scholarship is the only affordable route to attending college — is almost understandable. As a result, parents may be more likely to go to court to challenge any decision or action by a coach or school that might diminish the chance of a scholarship.

Fortunately for athletics administrators, while parents might like to believe otherwise, students do not have a constitutionally protected right to participate in high school sports. In the vast majority of cases, the courts have found no legal right to participate in interscholastic athletics, even for athletes good enough to earn athletic scholarships. Participation in athletics, the courts have held, is a privilege only. Therefore, school and athletics administrators have every right to suspend or bar athletes from competing on teams for any number of reasons, including alcohol and drug use.

That said, school and athletics administrators should nonetheless follow proper procedure when suspending or banning an athlete from sports. In particular, prior to meting out a suspension, proper due process requires that the athlete be given oral and written notice of the charges against him or her and, if he or she denies them, an explanation of the evidence the authorities have. The student should then be given an opportunity to refute the allegations against him or her to an impartial decision-maker — and, if necessary, the opportunity for an appeal.

Case Summary

At one Pennsylvania high school, being drunk and found carrying pot at a high school football game netted an underage student a 10-day suspension from school — and an even longer one from a school sports team. After 17-year-old Eric Burgey of Palmer Township was busted on Sept. 12, a school board committee recommended a 45-day ban from all extracurricular activities, which would have allowed Burgey, a member of the Easton Area High School wrestling team, to return to practice Dec. 9 and competition after Dec. 28. But on Nov. 20, the full school board barred him for the entire year, leading Burgey and his parents to sue the school district, saying that the full-year ban was unfair and would damage his prospects of earning a college wrestling scholarship, according to a report in the Morning Call of Allentown. On Dec. 11, just prior to a hearing on Burgey's request for an injunction that was to be held in Northampton County Court, the family decided to abandon its lawsuit.



high school                           

Attorney John T. Wolohan (jwolohan@syr.edu) is a professor of sports law in the David B. Falk College of Sport and Human Dynamics at Syracuse University.
 

Comments:

I'm compelled to address this issue due to my previous occupation. My experience with younger athletes are more parent driven than should be allowed. What is best for the young athlete whether as a sports administrator or a parent? A balance that is seemingly impossible to reach. I have been in the unfortunate position to ban youths in various sports for the same reason. The common factor in all of the removals were inappropriate behavoir on the field. The infractions were handled appropriately and parents were well aware of the situation. Sadly, without positve results. Thank you John! Keep up the correct message!

Mr. Kevin Halligan   Youth Sports Director (former)  1/4/2009 8:28:57 AM

We've found that a comprehensive eligibility policy that encompasses academics, attendance and discipline has made the decisions to remove athletes easier. There are levels that need to be reached before we suspend an athlete, but by that point if he/she and the parents haven't gotten the message, shame on them. In fact the opening line of our policy states that "Athletics is a privilage, not a right....." Thank you for the reinforcement.

Jim Wright   Athletic Director  12/31/2008 7:39:08 PM

Excellent article. I look forward to reading your column.Thank you. Dick

Dick Borkowski   Athletic Director (retired)  12/29/2008 11:36:34 AM

John-I have spent over 30 years in public education and have been a secondary school administrator (VP and Principal) in 4 schools. The key is to not get emotionally charged when making a decision concerning discipline or playing time. Parents may not agree with your decision and they seem to be more apt to "defend" their child who is involved in athletics, but by providing appropriate due process you should be on legal high ground. It doesn't mean that your decision can't be over-turned by the hearing officer or assigned 3rd party, but you have protection from liability.

Bo Myers   Director of Athletics and Leisure Studies  12/29/2008 10:57:10 AM

Post a comment

Name:
Job Title:
Email:
(not published)
Comment:  
(maximum 1,000 characters)  
Search articles:

 

Related Pages

Athletic Departments and First Amendment ...
Aaron Smith was looking forward to joining a dozen or so members of the mainstream media at a scheduled gathering of University of ...

Court: Permission Form Did Not Infringe on ...
A board of education's permission form did not infringe on a parent's First Amendment rights, a court says.

College Coaches Still Lack Title IX Knowledge
The landmark law is pushing 40, but how it works (and is working) remains a mystery to many.

Related Categories
in the Buyers Guide:

Insurance

Sports Law Reviews

 

Featured Vendor

 

Facility of the Week

Ithaca College Athletics and Events Center

See project slideshow

 



Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   YouTube   AB Forum   ABC & Expo

Advertisement



Advertisement



Advertisement