Advertisement

Officials Doing Their Job May Face Tort Litigation

By Andrew Cohen
May 27, 2009

     Comments (3)

An inadvertent collision on a football sideline that led to a coach's brain injury is, five years later, still causing all sorts of headaches for a regional association of officials and the national organization that oversees them.

In 2004, working a football game between Fox Tech and Brackenridge high schools in San Antonio, Texas, Charles Harpole, one of a team of five officials, was running down a 6-foot-wide swath in front of the Brackenridge bench that is supposed to be kept clear for officials trailing a play. Running full speed upfield, Harpole collided with an assistant coach, Terry English, knocking both unconscious. Harpole recovered fully from the incident and has since returned to officiating, while English was left with impaired memory and was forced to retire from teaching and coaching.

Since the accident, the two have become friends, and English reportedly harbors no ill will toward Harpole. However, in 2006, the coach's insurance carrier, Midwest Employers Casualty (from whom English collected worker's compensation benefits), sued Harpole, the team of officials and the Texas Association of Sports Officials (TASO), claiming their negligence caused English's injuries. Midwest argued that the officials failed to enforce a rule that bars coaches from standing in the sideline area where English was injured and that English was not warned to stay out of the officials' box, among other claims. TASO was severed from the original suit, and the officiating crew won a summary judgment in trial court, but Midwest has appealed the verdict to the Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio.

An amicus curiae brief filed in April by the National Association of Sports Officials pointed out that Harpole was doing exactly what an official is supposed to be doing. In the event that the trial court's verdict were overturned, NASO added, "nearly all of [NASO's] members do now or will in the future face the prospect of tort litigation concerning any sideline collision, or indeed any collision with a wayward coach, substitute player, athletic trainer, team physician, school employee, security officer, spectator or any other person who may be in close proximity to a sideline at an athletic event."



   

Andrew Cohen was on the staff of Athletic Business between 1991 and 2013; he was editor of the magazine for the last 15 years.
 

Comments:

OFFICIALS MUST ENFORCE ALL RULES ON THE PLAYING FIELD ETC. ALLOWING COACHES AND PLAYERS TO LEAVE THEIR TEAM BENCH OR DESIGNATED AREA CAUSES MANY PROBLEMS. THOSE OFFICIALS WHO DON'T ENFORCE THE RULES, NO MATTER HOW SMALL THEY THINK THE RULE IS , INVITE THE WRATH OF THOSE INJURED. THE RULES ARE WRITTEN TO PROTECT BOTH THE OFFICIALS, COACHES AND PLAYERS.

K FISHER  UMPIRE CONSULTANT  6/9/2010 3:46:09 PM

Perhaps it is time for athletic adminstrators to start having all members of the coaching and event support staff to 'sign off' that they understand that, just like game participants, there is an inherent risk of injury involved in coaching or working at an athletic event. I encourage all our coaches to participate in ImPACT concussion baseline testing with their athletes for just such an occasion like what occurred. I do this 1) to protect the coaches I work with and 2) help them gain a greater understanding of the risks associated with concussion. But, from the sounds of this story, the next question becomes, how can we protect ourselves from the insurance companies?

S. E. Wagner   Athletic Trainer  5/29/2009 9:27:46 AM

Another sad example of where we are going to make the law suit game the new "national pastime." There is another problem in the athletic law suit dilemma, usually unrecognized by all except the athletic director. Once a coach, A.D. goes through the "lawyer's game," they drop out of "the game" and quit coaching. Another valuable resource for kids - out the window (well, coaching box at least). Keep this information going. Well done.

Dick Borkowski   Sport and Recreation Safety Consultant  5/28/2009 6:59:38 AM

Post a comment

Name:
Job Title:
Email:
(not published)
Comment:  
(maximum 1,000 characters)  
Search articles:

 

Related Pages

Use of ‘Suspension Training’ Term Focus of ...
Discovery materials are due to be presented Oct. 12 in the case of Fitness Anywhere Inc. v. Lifeline International, with a trial due to ...

School, Coaches Not Responsible for Player's ...
During the second half of a Jan. 2004 basketball game between Iowa Mennonite High School and the Winfield-Mt. Union Community School ...

High School Loses Retaliation Case
One of the ugly truths in high school and college athletics is that there is some number of sexual predators working as coaches. ...

 

Featured Vendor

 

Facility of the Week

Ithaca College Athletics and Events Center

See project slideshow

 



Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   YouTube   AB Forum   ABC & Expo

Advertisement



Advertisement



Advertisement