Advertisement

Epithet-Hurling Teacher's Suit Tossed

By AB Editors
Mar. 25, 2009

     Comments (5)
A racial epithet led to some tense moments at a 2007 high school basketball game and, subsequently, to a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia. The incident involved Fatima Parker, an African-American special education teacher with Albemarle County Public Schools, who used the "n-word" in reference to an African-American referee with whose calls she was loudly disagreeing. The following day, Parker alleged, she was told by school administrators that the referee and the NAACP filed complaints about her language, after which she was suspended for five days with pay, received a reprimand and suspension notice in her employee file, was referred to the district's Employee Assistance Program, was prohibited from attending any school sporting events for the rest of the school year and was required to write a letter of apology to the referee. After all that, Parker discovered that neither the referee nor the NAACP had actually filed a complaint about the incident; she therefore filed a grievance over the disciplinary action, which was denied. She then filed suit, arguing that the use of the "n-word" between African-Americans is culturally acceptable and that her use of the word at the basketball game did not constitute obscene or abusive language. She contended, therefore, that the school board and administrators' conclusion that she used abusive and obscene language was tinged with racial bias. She also argued that the severity of the punishment was not proportional to the severity of the offense. However, the court dismissed the case, saying that neither Parker's procedural nor her substantive due-process rights had been violated.
<br><br>
<a href="/articles/?a=1933" style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(7, 53, 131);">Color Analysis</a>: In a year of political change, advocacy groups see the same old racial disparities on the football sidelines. <br>



   

 

Comments:

You proved Miss Parker's point, the fact that she didn't get fired says how other sectors of our society view African American, and their view how African Americans treat each other. Others don't care with the same degree that African Americans use the "n-word" towards each other, that they do if someone who isn't African American uses it. It's in African American music, movies, etc. and almost none of that is ever band and its bought and viewed by all cultural entities. Which says and supports Miss Parker's argument that it is "socially acceptable" not only by the large majority of African Americans but also by everyone else in our society. It's only when someone else (non-African American) has been penalized by using the "n-word" and its always towards an African American, then its needs to be equal and fair penalization. We can't think of one media worthy case where someone non-African American used the "n-word" towards someone that wasn't African American, it doesn't have the same effect. I didn't have to be at that came to know that she wasn't the only person using the "n-word". But once again some of the other issues that were not addressed, IF the administration felt so strongly about her conduct, WHY didn't they own up to their stance on the issue right from the start, why say the ref or NAACP filed the complaint? It was simply a opportunity for them to put a negative mark on work record in order to hold her back in the future. Had they been upfront in the first place this wouldn't have been an issue, they were counting on her accepting her punishment with fighting it and not looking into the complaint. What would have happened was later at some interview someone would have denied her an opportunity for a position and she wouldn't have even known why. Now she may still get denied but at least she will know why.

Terry Alexander   Coach/Administrator  3/28/2009 5:45:55 PM

Miss Parker said it was "socially acceptable" to use the "n-word" between african Americans. I find this a highly interesting and inept commment on her part. If a white person said this, that person would have been have ridiculed and susupended but unemployed today. Her choice of words were immature and unprofessional and she should know this. As far as her saying the punishment being too severe, people have lost their jobs for saying things like this. There is a double standard as she should have been fired.

DR   student  3/27/2009 11:02:21 AM

You're the one being discriminatory for saying that a woman can't be head of football. They aren't saying that.

BR     3/27/2009 10:57:38 AM

Please. The use of the "n-word" should not be tolerated no matter what the race of the speaker may be. The school's misrepresentations do not change the fact that Ms. Parker used reprehensible language. The fact of the matter is that a school administrator/teacher/coach/representitive cannot use such language and the school's reaction was completely understandable regardless of whether or not the NAACP or the ref filed a formal complaint against her. Furthermore, Ruth's analogy to the AD/Head Football coach position is completely misplaced and unrelated.

RS   Law student  3/25/2009 3:57:49 PM

It's not just racial it's sexual also. A female in the state of Texas has a very hard time applying for an Athletic Directors position because almost all of these positions are posted as AD/Head Football, thus effectively eliminating a woman's potential for advancement. It is a legal discriminatory act that should not be tolerated!

ruth mcwilliams   teacher/coach  3/25/2009 12:35:57 PM

Post a comment

Name:
Job Title:
Email:
(not published)
Comment:  
(maximum 1,000 characters)  
Search articles:

 

Related Pages

Title IX Blogger Erin Buzuvis Reflects on ...
Erin Buzuvis set out six years ago to become an expert on Title IX, the federal antidiscrimination law that turns 40 this month. So the ...

Anti-Discrimination Laws Trump Town's ...
Anti-discrimination laws trump a town's longstanding policy of holding gender-based tournaments.

Student-Athlete Fails to Prove ...
A student-athlete's harassment case flounders when she fails to prove administrators ignored her complaints.

Related Categories
in the Buyers Guide:

Insurance

Sports Law Reviews

 

Featured Vendor

 

Facility of the Week

Cowichan Lake Sports Arena Renovation and Addition

See project slideshow

 



Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   YouTube   AB Forum   ABC & Expo

Advertisement



Advertisement



Advertisement