A new drug testing policy at Rutgers, implemented last August, relaxes penalties student-athletes receive if they are found to have used marijuana. The new policy creates a distinction between penalties for marijuana and other drugs, including hard drugs such as cocaine or heroin, or performance enhancing drugs.
New Jersey Advance Media obtained the new Rutgers Athletics Alcohol and Drug Education and Testing Program document through an open records request. The policy outlines a stepped disciplinary stage framework that increases and intensifies penalties for repeat offenses.
According to NJ.com, each phase of the new enforcement protocol calls for education and mandatory drug-test monitoring, but also includes additional sanctions. They are:
For a first violation, a suspension lasting for a period between “0 and 10 percent” of a season for PEDs or hard drugs, but no suspension for marijuana.
For a second violation, a suspension lasting for a period between 10 and 25 percent of the season for PEDs or hard drugs, and 0 to 10 percent of a season for marijuana.
For a third violation, a suspension lasting between 30 and 100 percent of one season for PEDs or hard drugs, and 10 to 25 percent of one season for marijuana.
For a fourth violation, dismissal from the team for PEDs or hard drugs, and 30 to 100 percent of one season for marijuana.
Finally, a fifth marijuana violation will result in dismissal from the team.
While the NCAA does not require member schools to adopt a drug-testing policy, schools that do are subject to NCAA guidelines. Last month, the NCAA sent Rutgers a Notice of Allegations alleging that the athletics program violated those guidelines by not sanctioning 30 football players who failed their first drug test. The NOA claims that 16 players were allowed to play without disciplinary action over a four-year period.
Both the NCAA and the Big Ten Conference have random drug-testing policies for participants in championship events; however, the Big Ten does not test for marijuana.
The new Rutgers policy allows for head coaches to institute their own drug enforcement rules, so it’s possible that student-athletes could be subject to stricter marijuana rules that their head coach lays out.
“It balances our concerns for our student-athletes’ well-being with our desire to provide rehabilitation where necessary, and sanction when appropriate, including expulsion from the team, ultimately,” Rutgers AD Pat Hobbs told NJ.com. “In the end I think it’s a fair policy, and I think it’s one that’s consistent with the other FBS schools.”
Do you think Rutgers' new drug policy is a model for schools across the nation?
Jason Scott is Online Managing Editor of Athletic Business.
Book Provides Warning to Schools Looking to Hire Briles Now that the lawsuits are starting to get settled, Art Briles is making noise about coaching again. His attorney, Mark Lanier, told the Waco Tribune-Herald last week that schools had reached out to the former Baylor coach and practically predicted he'd be back on the sideline in 2018. So it's a good time for another reminder of why that shouldn't happen -- not now, not ever. As it happens, that reminder arrives Tuesday in the form of Violated, a new book co-authored by ESPN reporters Paula Lavigne and Mark Schlabach that offers the most comprehensive account to date of the Baylor sexual assault scandal that brought down Briles, school president and chancellor Ken Starr and athletics director Ian McCaw among others. read more
Baylor Settles Suit with Rape Victim The first woman to sue Baylor University over allegations the nations largest Baptist school ignored or mishandled rape allegations has settled her case, her attorney said Tuesday. Jasmin Hernandez sued Baylor in early 2016, two months before the school released the results of an internal investigation that found Baylor had mishandled rape or assault cases for years and the football program acted as if it was above the rules. read more
Colleges React to New NCAA Sexual Violence Rules A new rule, adopted by the NCAA Board of Governors last week, requires campus leaders to report annually that their coaches, athletes and athletics administrators were educated in sexual violence prevention. It also mandates campus officials declare that athletics departments are knowledgeable and compliant with institutional policies and processes regarding sexual violence prevention and that school policies are readily available in the athletics department and are distributed to student athletes. The requirements, announced by the NCAA in a news release last week, reinforce the work some Tennessee colleges and universities already have in place, though one Division III school said this week it's still awaiting more information to see if it might need to make changes. read more
New Mexico Paid $31K for Extra Football Practice Week The University of New Mexico football program paid an extra $30,699 for the additional week of preseason practice allowed this year by the NCAA, UNM's assistant athletic director for football operations said - not $100,000, as stated on Tuesday at a Board of Regents Finance and Facilities Committee meeting. read more