Advertisement
AB Newswire

Home Account Search
CPSC Changes Its Mind on Unblockable Pool Drains
Reversing a decision made nearly 18 months ago, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission on Wednesday voted, 3-2, to change its guidelines regarding how aquatic facility operators comply with the Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act. Now, in order to comply with the law aimed at preventing suction entrapment in pool drains, public pools with a single main drain must have a back-up system capable of shutting the drain's suction.

Previously, an unblockable drain — originally defined by the act as a "drain of any size and shape that a human body cannot sufficiently block to create a suction entrapment hazard," such as a dome-shaped cover — was considered acceptable. On Wednesday, according to the Associated Press, commissioners expressed concerns that the drain cover could break, come loose or be improperly installed. Hence, the decision to reverse course.

The move, which came after two hours of often contentious and emotional debate, is a blow to public pool facilities with single-drain systems, which must purchase and install new and costly back-up systems — or close their doors if they don't comply — by the tentative date of May 28, 2012. Many facility operators have already spent thousands of dollars retrofitting their pools with new drain covers.

Pools with multiple drains are not affected by the vote.

Wednesday's vote was precipitated by one of the agency's five commissioners wanting to change his earlier vote on how pool operators should interpret the law, the AP reports. “My previous interpretation is wrong,” Bob Adler said in the meeting, explaining that he has spent months talking to lawmakers who helped write the law and to industry officials, as well as hearing from parents who lost children in entrapment accidents.

As AP reporter Jennifer Kerr writes, the overall impact on cities and states is not clear, because neither the CPSC nor industry officials were able to provide figures on how many of the nation’s estimated 300,000 public pools have single-drain systems.

Although public comment was not welcome prior to Wednesday's meeting, public input will be sought regarding the May 28 effective date for the changed policy. “It’s like saying we’re going to guillotine you, now tell us what day would be convenient,” dissenting commissioner Nancy Nord said.

Prior to the meeting, as Athletic Business sister publication AQUA reported, "some industry observers have stated that this change is unnecessary, pointed out that the vacillating rulings of the CPSC create an atmosphere of uncertainty, and noted that this strong blow to the finances of public pools diminishes their ability to provide the swimming instruction that prevents drowning, a much larger threat to public safety than entrapment."

Between 1999 and 2010, there were 12 fatalities — mostly children — from pool and hot tub drain entrapments, as well as approximately 80 injuries, according to government figures. "In stark contrast, over 1,500 families have lost a loved one due to drowning this year alone," Thomas M. Lachocki, chief executive officer of the National Swimming Pool Foundation, said in a statement. "The recession has resulted in hundreds of pool closures, reducing swim lessons and increasing unemployment. The commission's decision to include another level of entrapment protection may increase drowning risk as pools close and fewer children learn to swim."
Posted At 4:39 PM • Comments (9)

Thanks for your coverage on this Mike. Additionally, may I point out that there have been no reports of any entrapments or entrapment related injuries since 2008.
Comment By Laurie Batter At 9/28/2011 5:31 PM
This is an outrage! The commissioners that voted in favor of this are in the pockets of the anti-vacuuum industry. No consideration has been given to the pool operators and all consideration to the commercial industry. The CPSC says 'Pool Safely', I would like to Pool Safely but I am having to sepnd all my money on drains covers for my dual drain gravity pools that didn't need new covers and now suction devices...
Comment By Jim Wheeler At 9/29/2011 11:38 AM
FYI - as we move forward with repairing the pool.
Comment By John and Jack At 9/29/2011 12:29 PM
I so agree with Jim!! And how many of these fatalities were at public pools?!?! I believe they were residential and/or spas where the PARENTS should be responsible for the neglect. Lets just take one more healthy activity away from our children. The schools havent taken away enough ..
Comment By Ann Onomous At 9/29/2011 12:34 PM
Can somebody please provide me a single instance of entrapment at a municipal pool with gravity drains? The horror stories of entrapment are heart-wrenching, but all the events that I have read about have occurred in spas, residential, and private facilities without gravity drain systems. I believe the regulation is necessary, but the reach has extended too far to include the municipal facilities with gravity drains to surge tanks that never presented a risk of entrapment.
Comment By Jill At 9/29/2011 2:21 PM
does anyone know if it does include gravity fed systems....this is crazy..
Comment By jasper At 9/30/2011 8:27 AM
A gravity fed system is considered a 'back up' as I understand the law and interpretation.
Comment By Tom Lachocki At 9/30/2011 2:50 PM
Here's the text of the CPSC Press Release. There are 5 acceptable backup methods including gravity drainage system:

www.cpsc.gov/PR/Adler09282011.pdf
Comment By Andy Darling At 9/30/2011 4:08 PM
When I was in Washington, DC for the CPSC Unblockable Hearing” (pun intended), I had the opportunity to meet with Commissioners Northrup, Nord, Adler, and the attorneys for Commissioners Moore and Chairwoman Tenenbaum.

I presented a brief profile of the National Swimming Pool Foundation, and it’s efforts to prevent injury, illness and drowning. I summarized our position which was also stated in the letter we sent last week.
1) There have been no entrapments for three years since the Virginia Graeme Baker Pool & Spa Safety Act became law.
2) I provided data from the last three months detailing the hundreds to thousands of pools that are being closed or on the verge of being closed due to the depressing economic times. I reinforced that preserving pools is critical to teach children to swim so they are less likely to drown.
3) I reinforced how confusing a change would be now if there is no net benefit AFTER the CPSC has funded millions to organizations, including NSPF, to educate people in our field and public health officials.

When I was in DC, I took the Metro to the heart of our capital - “the Mall” – for an evening jog. As I visited memorials for Vietnam Veterans, Korean Veterans, Abraham Lincoln, WWII veterans, George Washington, and then Martin Luther King, I read these words chiseled into marble: 'The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy - MLK.'

I fear that the CPSC decision to revoke the unblockable drain rule will result in more children drowning and none will be saved from entrapment. The National Drowning Prevention Alliance reported that this summer alone there have been about 1,500 drowning fatalities in the US.

In stark contrast, THERE HAVE BEEN NO FATALTIES DUE TO SUCTION ENTRAPMENT FOR THREE YEARS. To add perspective, as reported in the New American, “in 2001 alone, there were 91,870 hospital emergency room-treated injuries associated with trampolines, which, ironically, was reported by CPSC.” Ninety two thousand is a lot bigger than zero.

As the CPSC requires an additional level of protection to an unblockable drain, how many more facilities will be pushed over a financial cliff and be forced to close? How many fewer children will learn to swim? How many children will drown as a result? How many more lifeguards, facility managers, operators, service companies, and manufacturers will lose their jobs for fewer pools?

As an American, I am troubled that our government decided to impose an additional cost on aquatic facilities who are fighting drowning and obesity by helping our children learn to swim. If the change actually had a chance of saving lives, I’d think differently.

I know we stand united in commitment to eliminate entrapment. At what point can we all declare victory in memory of Miss Baker, Miss Taylor, Master Cohn and others? Tens of thousands of facilities, service companies, design engineers, manufacturers, and others moved to implement the law. And for three years, the record is perfect. Is there another CPSC/industry partnership that has met with such success?

How can we stand by and say it is OK to push more life-saving facilities to bankruptcy? How can we accept fewer children learning to swim? How can we accept a government decision that puts the many at risk for the good of the few (or in this case, the none)? How many people must lose their jobs because one government official decides to change his mind?

When I go to DC, I am excited. It is so AMAZING and so different.
When I go to DC, I am fearful! It is so amazing and so DIFFERENT.

When I traveled around on the DC METRO, construction was happening; the streets were busy; the cafes were bustling. I did not notice family businesses closed in strip malls - like I see around the country. The economy seems like it was robust - bolstered by increased federal spending. Cruising around the region in the best mass transit system in the nation was comfortable and convenient. And yet, today, my heart remains troubled that our “leaders” failed to stand in the face of challenge and controversy to prevent drowning by supporting the public servants who teach our children to swim and survive.

Three years ago I was inspired by eloquent words and a national outcry for – CHANGE. As the son of Polish emigrants who reveled and were blessed to live the “American Dream,” I love this country. Yet, two days ago, for the first time in my life, my tears joined those of 1,500 families whose tears fell on deaf ears – when I was in DC. This was not quite the change I was hoping for.
Comment By Tom Lachocki At 9/30/2011 6:07 PM
Comments :
 
Name :
Email :
       
 
Comments :





Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   YouTube   AB Forum   ABC & Expo

Advertisement



Advertisement



Advertisement