LexisNexis(R) logoAthleticBusiness.com has partnered with LexisNexis to bring you this content.

Copyright 2017 News & Record (Greensboro, North Carolina)
All Rights Reserved

News & Record (Greensboro, North Carolina)

 

CHAPEL HILL - Tuesday was the deadline for the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and three people involved in the academic fraud scandal to respond to the NCAA's latest notice of allegations.

Greg Sankey, the chairman of the NCAA's committee on infractions and the commissioner of the Southeastern Conference, set that deadline in a letter April 14 in which he said there would be no further extensions in the case. If that holds true, a hearing is likely in mid-August.

A UNC spokesman said Tuesday that the university would meet the NCAA's deadline for responding to the latest notice of allegations in the academic-athletic scandal, but the response might not be made public for several days.

The notice of allegations in this case has gone through three iterations. The latest adds allegations of unethical conduct and impermissible benefits against the two creators of the classes - former African and Afro-American Studies chairman Julius Nyang'oro and his longtime administrative assistant, Deborah Crowder. Those allegations undergird the notice's biggest charge - a lack of institutional control against UNC.

The scandal involves 18 years of bogus classes that athletes - particularly in the revenue sports of football and men's basketball - took disproportionately. The classes had no instruction and typically provided a high grade for a term paper; most of them were created and graded by Crowder before she retired in 2009.

More than 3,100 students took at least one class, according an investigation led by former federal prosecutor Kenneth Wainstein. Roughly half were athletes, who make up 4 percent of the student body.

"Although general students also took the anomalous classes, Crowder and Nyang'oro worked closely and directly with athletics," the NCAA's notice said.

UNC had largely made procedural arguments to try to shoot down the NCAA's case as it relates to the classes. But the infractions committee rejected those arguments in a special hearing six months ago.

The latest delay in the case stemmed from Crowder's decision to be interviewed by NCAA investigators. That took place last week. Crowder had declined the NCAA's interview requests over the prior three years.

Crowder said in an affidavit that the classes she created and graded were legitimate and that she was trying to help all students. She also contends Nyang'oro initially graded the papers for the classes, and she took that task over because he was traveling frequently.

Nyang'oro has not sought to fight the allegations made against him. Jan Boxill, a former faculty leader and academic adviser to the women's basketball team, is also accused of providing improper academic help.

She also contends what she did was proper.

Read More of Today's AB Headlines

Subscribe to Our Daily E-Newsletter

 
May 17, 2017
 
 
 

 

Copyright © 2017 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy