• Former UMD Women's Hockey Coach Wins $3.7M Verdict

    by Paul Steinbach March 2018

    Shannon Miller, who sued the University of Minnesota Duluth after her contract as women's hockey coach was not renewed following the 2014-15 season, won a $3.74 million jury verdict Thursday.

    Miller, who led the Bulldogs for 16 seasons, claimed under Title VII and Title IX that UMD had discriminated against her due to her gender and because she had complained about unequal gender treatment at the school. The jury took four hours of deliberation to reach its decision, with the award total taking into account loss of salary and emotional distress.

    "When you get a verdict like that, you know that justice has taken the right course, and it’s a big day really for women, for women period, but especially for women in college athletics," said Miller after emerging from the courthouse, as reported by Fox21 KQDS in Duluth.

    Miller, whose annual salary of more than $200,000 was the largest among women's hockey coaches in the country, was the third coach in NCAA history to reach 350 wins, ultimately posting a 383–144–50 record at UMD. Her teams made seven Frozen Four appearances and won five national championships, then missed qualifying for the NCAA tournament four years in a row. In the three years since Miller's departure, the Bulldogs have made one NCAA tournament appearance, losing in the first round, to go with two losing seasons.

    UMD officials justified the decision not to renew Miller by citing the school's $6 million budget deficit and its flagging "return on investment" in Miller, as measured by cost per win.

    "I will certainly take time to rethink the process and things we did, but I can tell you I stand firm on the decision that was made," UMD chancellor Lendley Black said. "I will also continue to take action to see that we further the growth of the climate at UMD so that everyone on campus feels respected and they feel welcome and they feel safe."

    In addition, Black voiced support for athletic director Josh Berlo, who arrived at UMD in 2013 and received a two-year contract extension last year. 

    "I hope other athletic directors are watching and can learn from this, and I hope female coaches are watching and are ready to step up and fight for themselves a little harder than maybe they were before," said Miller, who along with two other former UMD coaches has a state discrimination lawsuit against the university pending.

    In the meantime, Miller, whose resume also includes leading the Canadian national team to a gold medal at the International Ice Hockey Federation World Women's Championships in 1997 and a silver medal at the Winter Olympics in Nagano a year later, has actively sought employment at the highest levels of her sport. "I would love to be the first female hockey coach in the NHL. I'll continue to follow that path," she said, adding, "I’ve applied for men's hockey jobs. There’s lots of men coaching in women's athletics, I absolutely see no reason why women can't coach in men's athletics."

  • Minnesota Coaches Face Contract Scrutiny

    by Sid Hartman March 2018

    Gophers athletic director Mark Coyle said that he knows there are a lot of questions surrounding the contracts of some of his coaches, but he said for the most part he likes what he has seen from them.

  • Miami Filed First Lawsuit Over Cancelled Arkansas State Game

    by Andy Berg March 2018

    The University of Miami was first to file a lawsuit against Arkansas State over a football game cancelled due to Hurricane Irma.

  • U.S. Teams Lead the Way for Equal Pay

    by Andrew Das March 2018

    Two years after they began a public fight for equal pay, and a year after they signed a new collective bargaining agreement, the U.S. women's soccer team has emerged as a new kind of role model, and a surprisingly valuable resource, for women's teams from around the world.

  • Quirks in College Basketball Coaching Contracts

    by Steve Berkowitz March 2018

    Because you can never be sure of the benefits included — or, in at least one case, not included — in a college men's basketball coach's contract, here is a look at some of the more unusual provisions of current agreements.

  • Arkansas State May Sue Miami Over Canceled Game

    by Jason Scott February 2018

    Hurricane Irma caused all kinds of problems for sports teams in its wake. Even major football games were canceled or rescheduled, and one of them is still causing headaches.

  • Pitino, Jurich Get Help from Attorney General’s Ruling

    by Andy Berg February 2018

    Former Louisville basketball coach Rick Pitino and former athletic director Tom Jurich might have just received help in their cases against their former employer from a local news outlet and the Kentucky attorney general. 

  • Louisville Suing Pitino for Damage to Reputation

    by Paul Steinbach December 2017

    Two weeks after former men's basketball coach Rick Pitino sued the University of Louisville for breach of contract, the university is pursuing a counter suit, claiming Pitino's "wrongful conduct" as coach has damaged Louisville's reputation.

    According to, the lawsuit argues that Pitino, not the university, is financially responsible for the multiple scandals that have plagued the program during his 16 years at its helm. Pitino was fired Oct. 16 after an FBI probe uncovered widespread corruption in college basketball. Over the years, Pitino has been accused of being aware of or encouraging recruiting tactics that included funneling money to the families of prospective recruits and enticing prospects with prostitutes. The latter scenario ultimately forced Louisville to vacate all victories between 2012 and 2015, including the 2013 national championship, and return all related earnings.

    The university claims Pitino is responsible for that money, as well as ticket sales and enrollment revnue Louisville has lost due to its tarnished reputation. In addition, Louisville seeks payback on all bonuses and other compensation "wrongly paid" to Pitino during this period.

    By counter-suing, Louisville is seeking to not only thwart Pitino's efforts to sue the school for the near $37 million remaining on his contract, but actually have Pitino compensate the university. The total damages amount sought by Louisville is unclear as of this writing.


  • Pitino Suing Louisville for $35M over Termination

    by Paul Steinbach December 2017

    Former University of Louisville men's basketball coach Rick Pitino is suing the school's athletic department for the more than $35 million in compensation that remained on his contract.

    Louisville fired Pitino in October after it was determined he had knowledge of and supported a system whereby the university's sponsor shoe company Adidas was paying recruits to sign with the Cardinals. By claiming it had "just cause" for the termination, Louisville relieved itself of honoring the remainder of Pitino's contract. On Thursday, Pitino filed a breach-of-contract lawsuit in U.S. District Court, claiming the University of Louisville Athletic Associaton did not have a case for the "just cause" firing. It also claims that Louisville did not properly inform Pitino that he had been placed on administrative leave, which his lawyers claim was tantamount to termination.

    According to Louisville Courier Journal, Pitino seeks $4.3 million per year, the value of his contract, from the date of the school's last payment through his contract's end in June 2026, or the value of his actual losses, which includes his personal Adidas contract. Adidas terminated its personal services contract with Pitino after he was fired.

    Three causes were cited for the firing. One, the university asserted that Pitino was involved in or had knowledge of the illegal recruiting tactics. Secondly, Pitino failed to alert the athletic department to the presence on campus of Christian Dawkins, a rogue agent. And third, Pitino failed to exercise control over his program in the wake of allegations that escorts had been purchased to entice recruits, the university claimed.

    Pitino's legal team counters that the former coach never admitted to wrongdoing, even when wiretapped, and that he had insufficient knowledge of Dawkins to warrant reporting his presence to the athletic department.

    According to Sports Illustrated legal analyst Michael McCann, Pitino's lawsuit faces long odds of succeeding. "This is mainly because Pitino’s contract contains expansive and vague language for the university to construct a valid rationale for firing with just cause," McCann writes. "For instance, he would have violated his contract by failing to: diligently supervise compliance of his assistant coaches; promote an atmosphere of compliance; or avoid disparaging media publicity. In order to conclude that Pitino did not violate his contract, one would likely have to believe that Pitino was unaware and uninvolved in any of the corruption that was both around him and that appeared to benefit him."



  • Jurich Reviews Could Derail Case for Firing

    by Andy Berg November 2017

    The University of Louisville could have a tough time justifying its firing of athletic director Tom Jurich in light of glowing reviews that highlight his tenure at the school.