A federal judge has dismissed Washington State University athletic director Pat Chun and the state's governor, Jay Inslee, from a lawsuit brought by former WSU football coach Nick Rolovich, who was terminated in October 2021 for refusing vaccination from COVID-19.
U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Rice left open three claims against WSU in his ruling Tuesday. Rice will consider allegations of state wage law violations, breach of contract and religious discrimination against WSU in summary judgment.
A federal judge has dismissed Washington State University athletic director Pat Chun and the state's governor, Jay Inslee, from a lawsuit brought by former WSU football coach Nick Rolovich, who was terminated in October 2021 for refusing vaccination from COVID-19.
U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Rice left open three claims against WSU in his ruling Tuesday. Rice will consider allegations of state wage law violations, breach of contract and religious discrimination against WSU in summary judgment.
“This Court and many others around the country have consistently found COVID-19 vaccine mandates for state employees are facially neutral and generally applicable, and terminating an employee for failing to comply with a vaccine mandate is a permissible employment action,” Rice wrote in his decision, as reported by The Seattle Times.
Related: WSU Fires Rolovich for Refusing COVID-19 Vaccine
Rolovich contends that WSU and Chun fired him without just cause. Rolovich says he should have been provided a religious exemption to a law requiring state employees to get the vaccine. The requirement has since been rescinded.
Rice ruled that Chun is entitled to qualified immunity in his official role as athletic director, and that there are no facts to support Rolovich’s claim he was terminated because of his religious views.
Related: Former Football Coach Rolovich Files Complaint Against WSU, AD
The university contends that Rolovich did not raise religious concerns about the vaccine’s development until a deadline approached for him to get the shots, and that WSU’s denial of his exemption was based on its inability to accommodate his coaching under pandemic-related guidelines and skepticism about the sincerity of his beliefs.
According to James Hanlon of the Times, WSU argued that Rolovich’s accommodation request would have resulted in increased travel costs, harm to recruitment and fundraising efforts, damage to WSU’s reputation and donor commitments, in addition to an increased risk of exposure to COVID-19 to student-athletes and other coaching staff.
In Tuesday’s court order, Rice wrote that WSU needs more evidence to support its claim that accommodating Rolovich was an undue hardship.
