The Brown University athletic departmentās cuts have allegedly violated laws ensuring gender equality in sports.
According to The Associated Press, attorneys for Public Justice and the American Civil Liberties Union of Rhode Island filed a motion in federal court Monday, alleging that Brown University is in violation of Title IX about a month after the Excellence in Brown Athletics Initiative transitioned 11 varsity sports team to club status.
The private Ivy League university in Providence, R.I., immediately ended varsity competition for menās and womenās fencing, menās and womenās golf, womenās skiing, menās and womenās squash, womenās equestrian, menās indoor and outdoor track and field, and menās cross country. The university also moved the club coed sailing and womenās sailing programs to the varsity level.
Not all the cuts lasted, as university president Christina H. Paxson announced in early June that the menās indoor track and field, outdoor track and field and cross country programs will each maintain their varsity status.
"Our students, alumni and parents took the time to share their deeply personal stories of the transformative impact that participation in track, field and cross country has had on their lives," Paxson wrote in a letter announcing the reinstatement of those three sports. "Many noted that, through Brown's history, these sports have been a point of entry to higher education for academically talented students who otherwise would not have had the opportunity, many of them students of color. In addition, we heard from members of the women's track, field and cross country teams who made a compelling case that eliminating the men's program would adversely impact the women's program."
Related content: Brown Reinstates Menās Track, Field and Cross Country
As it currently stands, Brown cut three menās sports and five womenās sports while adding one coed sport and one womenās sport. The motion filed Monday alleges that the cuts violate terms of the federal Title IX law.
āDefendantsā decision to eliminate five womenās intercollegiate athletic varsity teams, and with them meaningful participation opportunities for women, constitutes a gross and willful violation of the Joint Agreement to the immediate and irreparable harm of the class," the motion states, asking the court to enforce Title IX and prevent Brown from cutting sports unless it can prove that the law hasnāt been violated.
The changes bring Brownās athletic department from 38 to 32 varsity teams for the 2020-21 school year.
āThe plaintiff in this case is taking the unusual step of asking Brown to see into the future to provide data on rosters for the coming year, and is doing this at a time when a pandemic has created tremendous and unprecedented uncertainty around college enrollments and the status of athletic competition for the fall season," Brown spokesman Brian Clark said in a statement.
Related content: What Title IX Fallout Might NIL Legislation Pose?