Premium Partners

Despite Gripes, Don't Expect Changes to Playoff System

AthleticBusiness.com has partnered with LexisNexis to bring you this content.


Copyright 2018 Dayton Newspapers, Inc.

Dayton Daily News (Ohio)

 

ATLANTA — Unlike the Bowl Championship Series, the College Football Playoff was built to withstand criticism instead of shifting to respond to yearly griping.

That structure is standing strong despite some blow-back.

Two SEC teams playing for the championship on Monday night in Atlanta? Not a problem. Two Power Five conferences left out of the final four, including Big Ten champ and bluest of blue bloods Ohio State? That's OK. Undefeated UCF never getting serious consideration for a spot in the playoff? Congratulations on a great season, but that's just the way it goes, Knights.

Despite this storm, the playoff is what it is for the foreseeable future. No one in position to fight for changes has given any indication tweaks are coming. Especially not expansion.

"The CFP was built on a more long-term foundation than the BCS was," College Football Playoff executive director Bill Hancock said Wednesday.

The playoff management committee is made up of the FBS conference commissioners and Notre Dame's athletic director, but the architects were mostly the commissioners of the Power Five conferences. Final approval was given by a panel of university presidents representing each conference. The system was locked into place with a 12-year television contract with ESPN. This is year four of that agreement.

"The BCS contracts were four years," Hancock said. "After two years of every agreement it was time to begin thinking about the next agreement."

The reality is if the commissioners wanted to expand, ESPN would not stop them, but the contract showed a commitment to the CFP that was often lacking in the BCS. Frequently with the BCS, debates about which teams did or did not make the championship game or the other BCS bowls led to changes to the selection process.

Good intentions, but not good optics.

Hancock said when reacting to complaints the goal was to make the BCS better, but "in hindsight that was not the best approach because it contributed to the public not understanding how it worked or the perceived mystery about it. And also led people to believe that the people who owned and operated it weren't really confident about it."

A month ago, on selection Sunday, after Georgia and Alabama (which did not even play in the SEC title game), were chosen by the selection committee to play in the semifinals, Big Ten Commissioner Jim Delany expressed full confidence in the playoff and the committee. Pac-12 Commissioner Larry Scott, whose conference was also left out, said he believed there was no reason to begin talking about expansion.

SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey, ACC Commissioner John Swofford and Big 12 Commissioner Bob Bowlsby have all echoed those sentiments.

Read More of Today's AB Headlines

Subscribe to Our Daily E-Newsletter

 
January 5, 2018
 
 
 

 

Copyright © 2018 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy
Buyer's Guide
Information on more than 3,000 companies, sorted by category. Listings are updated daily.
Learn More
Buyer's Guide
AB Show 2022 in Orlando
AB Show is a solution-focused event for athletics, fitness, recreation and military professionals.
Learn More
AB Show