Illinois State University officials have failed to stunt retaliation claims by the football teamās former offensive coordinator who says he was terminated for posting an āall lives matterā sign on his office door in September 2020.
As reported by Bloomberg Law, federal court last week found in Beathard v. Lyons, C.D. Ill., No. 21-cv-01352, 8/11/22 that Kurt Beathard was engaged in private speech protected by the First Amendment.
Illinois State University officials have failed to stunt retaliation claims by the football teamās former offensive coordinator who says he was terminated for posting an āall lives matterā sign on his office door in September 2020.
As reported by Bloomberg Law, federal court last week found in Beathard v. Lyons,Ā C.D. Ill., No. 21-cv-01352, 8/11/22 thatĀ Kurt Beathard was engaged in private speech protected by the First Amendment.
When a public employee makes a statement pursuant to their official job duties they arenāt protected by the First Amendment, Judge James E. Shadid of the US District Court for the Central District of Illinois said Thursday. But head coach Brock Spack, then-athletic director Larry Lyons and current athletic director Kyle Brennan failed to show that Beathard was acting within the scope of his official duties when he posted the message on his door, the judge said, denying the officialsā motion to dismiss.
Related: Illinois State Assistant Left 'All Lives Matter' Sign
Beathard wasnāt paid by the university to decorate his door, but was paid to coach football, Shadid said. In putting up the poster, Beathard was therefore expressing his personal views, the judge said.
The court cited a recent US Supreme Court rulingĀ that a high school coach who prayed after a game was engaged in private speech and that the school violated his First Amendment rights by firing him.
Related: Coach Fired After Replacing BLM Poster Files Lawsuit
Beathard also showed that his protected speech was at least a motivating factor in his termination, Shadid said.
Itās premature, however, to determine whether the university can justify firing Beathard because āthere is not enough information to properly weighā the interests of the school against the interests of Beathard as a public employee in commenting on matters of public concern, the judge said.
The defendantsĀ argued in a March 31 filing that āthe universityās interests in addressing student-athlete responseā to Beathardās speech and āavoiding further disruption of football team functioningā outweigh Beathardās speech interests, Bloomberg Law reported.
In late summer and fall of 2020 the ISU ācampus community was dealing with tension resulting from the death of George Floyd,ā according to Beathardās complaint.
In August, posters were printed supporting Black ISU student-athletes, including a football player, and several football coaches placed them on their office doors within the football facility.
Beathard alleges that someone placed one of the posters on his door without his permission. Beathard admits he removed the poster and replaced it with a handwritten sign saying āall lives matter to our lord & saviour Jesus Christ.ā
The message āupset some of the football players,ā and some boycotted practice on Sept. 1, 2020, according to the complaint.
Beathard was then āreassigned to a completely bogus and made-up position, where he worked from home until his contract ran out at the end of 2020,ā according to the complaint, which alleges that Spack informed Beathard the next day that he would be replaced as offensive coordinator.
